Rerelease Optima shell vs Original Differences

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

Post Reply
HKS_TRD
Approved Member
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:47 pm
Location: Australia

Rerelease Optima shell vs Original Differences

Post by HKS_TRD »

Can anyone confirm if the rerelease Optima shell is identical to the original or if not what the differences are.
I have a genuine original sticker set but no shell to go with it at this stage

User avatar
lin6499
Approved Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 8:00 pm
Location: Taichung City, Taiwan

Re: Rerelease Optima shell vs Original Differences

Post by lin6499 »

original and re-re, I have both of them and I think they are identical.

rccars4sal
Approved Member
Posts: 1001
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 1:05 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Rerelease Optima shell vs Original Differences

Post by rccars4sal »

There were some rere optimas on ebay for 269.00, scratched boxs. Cheap enough may be for parting out.

User avatar
hibernaculum
Approved Member
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:08 pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Rerelease Optima shell vs Original Differences

Post by hibernaculum »

Technically, if Kyosho created a new mold for the reissue Optima body, the reissue body may be considered different (even if similar). I can't speak for every mold Kyosho once had. Maybe they used the original body mold in the case of the Optima. But the general view is that many (all?) of the old molds Kyosho used in the 1980s no longer exist. So new molds had to be made. This was the case even for some Tamiya reissue bodies, as stated by Fumito Taki.

In a collecting sense, a car is only 100% vintage to me if the parts were manufactured in the heyday of the car's original release (the 80s). So even if the new Optima body were made with the same mold, but I had a choice between it and another one that I knew was from the 80s, I'd still prefer one from the 80s. No more fussy than the action figure collectors who want vintage packaging :wink:

User avatar
EvolutionRevolution
Approved Member
Posts: 1495
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Rerelease Optima shell vs Original Differences

Post by EvolutionRevolution »

hibernaculum wrote:Technically, if Kyosho created a new mold for the reissue Optima body, the reissue body may be considered different (even if similar). I can't speak for every mold Kyosho once had. Maybe they used the original body mold in the case of the Optima. But the general view is that many (all?) of the old molds Kyosho used in the 1980s no longer exist. So new molds had to be made. This was the case even for some Tamiya reissue bodies, as stated by Fumito Taki.
This also applies during the actual production period of a car, as injection molds are prone to wear and tear that leads to worse tolerances (not much of a problem in an action figure, major issue in anything that needs precise movement). Even when you look at parts that Kyosho have reused for other cars you will find small differences between batches from different years.

Kyosho have reused many parts originating from the Optima for a variety of other models, some of which were brought out 20 years later (!). Only in the last decade or so they have created more new molds for new cars. It's also quite fun to look at the gearboxes (especially front gearboxes) of cars released after the Optima and see that they basically are all based on the original Optima gearboxes with some changes. Kyosho's diffs for all of their 1/10 cars up to 2001 were all based on the diffs for the Optima. Etc. Etc.

This means that there are parts that still had the same part number 15-20 years later, with only the header card attached to the bag changing to the newer Kyosho designs...
In a collecting sense, a car is only 100% vintage to me if the parts were manufactured in the heyday of the car's original release (the 80s). So even if the new Optima body were made with the same mold, but I had a choice between it and another one that I knew was from the 80s, I'd still prefer one from the 80s. No more fussy than the action figure collectors who want vintage packaging :wink:
It also depends on whether you want to run the car or not. Older parts may have problems due to age, e.g. plastics become less supple over time and may break more easily.

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • FOUND! Finally an original OPTIMA shell - NON REPRO.
    by Bormac » » in Kyosho Forum
    2 Replies
    645 Views
    Last post by 1300GT
  • Optima rerelease vs optima mid / Lazer ZX-S evo
    by FC5687 » » in Kyosho Re-Release Forum
    12 Replies
    2701 Views
    Last post by FC5687
  • New protech body:differences from original?
    by aconsola » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    37 Replies
    3358 Views
    Last post by Volumiza
  • Original stealth transmission, any differences ?
    by MarkyDents » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    2 Replies
    800 Views
    Last post by juicedcoupe
  • kyosho rerelease optima pulleys
    by isobarik » » in Kyosho Re-Release Forum
    4 Replies
    759 Views
    Last post by Optinutz
  • Optima vs Turbo Optima differences
    by Grunger73 » » in Kyosho Forum
    27 Replies
    7212 Views
    Last post by Coelacanth
  • Late LWB Optima Mid & Lazer differences??
    by DerbyDan » » in Kyosho Forum
    3 Replies
    916 Views
    Last post by adam lancia
  • Optima Mid and Turbo Optima Mid Differences
    by vintage AE » » in Kyosho Forum
    19 Replies
    6216 Views
    Last post by lin6499

Return to “Kyosho Re-Release Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests