B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

Post Reply
User avatar
yellowdatsun
Approved Member
Posts: 844
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Phx, AZ

B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by yellowdatsun »

I'm sure this is somewhere on this site, but I can't find it.....

Just curious what years the B2 was available? I've heard anywhere from 6 months to 2 years.

Associated website says 95 to 97.

Also, what was the reason it was only in production for such a short period of time? Heck, even at the max 2 year mark, that's markedly short for any product.

The B3 and even B4 don't seem *that* different. I know arm lengths changed, and that the B3 upgrade kit was available for your B2, but still, seems like a crap ton of design and engineering work for a car to only be around for such a short period. Was the B2 that bad that they had to "correct" it with the B3 in just 2 years? Was there a big inherant problem with the car?

hugger19
Approved Member
Posts: 1689
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 2:33 pm
Location: 33445 florida
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by hugger19 »

i emailed the rc10 site the same question u asked. they said they will have to look in their files it might take some time. that was 3 days ago ill follow up with them by the end of next week and see what they have to say

User avatar
R Cane
Approved Member
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 9:06 am
Location: Northeast Ohio
Has thanked: 155 times
Been thanked: 63 times

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by R Cane »

From the miscellaneous things I've read, my guess is 1995, 1996 for production...
I don't think it was an issue of the car being "bad", but that the improvements just made it significantly better. The changes between the B2 and the add-on B3 upgrade kit look relatively minor if you look at them individually, but I think when combined, they made a very noticeable difference. But hey, I don't claim to be an expert, so just my 2 cents.

User avatar
bully
Approved Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 6:08 am
Location: Perth W.A Australia
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by bully »

Just fell in the time of changes in materials an design I think..

User avatar
Orange
Approved Member
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: Chandler, AZ USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by Orange »

I thought the B2 was a better car than the B3.
Sean Sanchez
Gallery:
The World is Orange! Latest Update: 03/31/16
My feedback

User avatar
jwscab
Super Member
Posts: 6487
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
Location: Chalfont, PA
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 443 times

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by jwscab »

B3 changed arms lengths and front geometry slightly. They also strengthened a couple of areas. Otherwise, it's the same as a B2, so you can consider the B3 a B2+, or B2.1. With a B2 and the B3 conversion, you could have either set of characteristics available.

User avatar
Orange
Approved Member
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:42 pm
Location: Chandler, AZ USA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by Orange »

I remember talking to someone at AE back then and they thought the changes were significant enough to call it a B3.... That was before the .1 .2... etc. craze that was coined for software updates.
Sean Sanchez
Gallery:
The World is Orange! Latest Update: 03/31/16
My feedback

nagreend
Approved Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2014 9:46 pm
Location: Hendersonville, NC

Re: B2 years, reason for short lifespan?

Post by nagreend »

I think a part of it was the era it existed in. The mid '90s were the peak of off-road electric racing, and it was super competitive between Losi and Associated. They pushed each other in ways they hadn't in the past, and the drivers of the time were some of the most popular figures in rc history. Of course, it might just seem that way to me!

I always wondered why the B2 had a composite chassis while the T2 had an aluminum chassis...

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • What POSSIBLE reason........
    by scr8p » » in Kyosho Forum
    165 Replies
    15319 Views
    Last post by Mr. ED
  • Reason for not hangin here lately
    by THUNDERSTRIKE1 » » in Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    12 Replies
    970 Views
    Last post by jwscab
  • reason for absence from board!!!!!!!!!!!
    by THUNDERSTRIKE1 » » in Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    7 Replies
    631 Views
    Last post by Halgar
  • Diagonal battery - any good reason?
    by markbt73 » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    8 Replies
    1419 Views
    Last post by n20capri
  • Reason for "cab-forward" modern bodies?
    by yellowdatsun » » in 21st Century Modern
    34 Replies
    5782 Views
    Last post by Chewbacca
  • Short Course LXT
    by 8rad » » in Losi Forum
    6 Replies
    717 Views
    Last post by Soncho Ponza
  • B3 - CVD's too short?
    by Dan442 » » in RC10 Buggy Forum
    6 Replies
    1047 Views
    Last post by Dan442
  • Short wheelbase T4
    by Dnewish2 » » in RC10 Truck Forum
    2 Replies
    843 Views
    Last post by Typicray@rainmans

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No User AvatarAmazon [Bot], No User AvatarTbot [Bot] and 51 guests