Page 2 of 2
Re: So here is the "real" Re Re question...
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:35 pm
by SnoopMaxx
Are the front towers on the 6001 and 6010, identical in height, other than the extra hole on the older version ?
In your opinion. Is the extra hole the only reason for the front ride height difference ?
Re: So here is the "real" Re Re question...
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:40 pm
by GoMachV
Yes, I compared them and they are identical minus the hole
Re: So here is the "real" Re Re question...
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:41 pm
by SFC K
SnoopMaxx wrote:Are the front towers on the 6001 and 6010, identical in height, other than the extra hole on the older version ?
In your opinion. Is the extra hole the only reason for the front ride height difference ?
Good questions Snoop. I was wondering the same thing. I do have a extra front tower that has both holes so I am curious what Jeff used.
I noticed you did not use the two aluminum spacers for the rear mount. Was that on purpose?
Re: So here is the "real" Re Re question...
Posted: Sun Oct 27, 2013 1:31 pm
by GoMachV
SFC K wrote:Good questions Snoop. I was wondering the same thing. I do have a extra front tower that has both holes so I am curious what Jeff used.
I noticed you did not use the two aluminum spacers for the rear mount. Was that on purpose?
are you talking to me? I used the stock tower which is identical to the original except they didnt drill the extra set of holes and I didnt either
I didnt use the rear body mount spacers per the manual as well
the only change I made was to use shock spacers in the rear as it is cosmetically the same as the manual shows