Page 3 of 24

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:32 pm
by terry.sc
These are from Radio Race Car September 1985. Darren Harris was one of Associateds team drivers in the UK at the time and all their cars were lightened like this and the wheelbase shortened.
Harris.jpg
Harris.jpg (86.58 KiB) Viewed 1778 times
Harris.jpg
Harris.jpg (86.58 KiB) Viewed 1778 times
Nick and Jane Adams were well known in the UK and were importers for the RC10. Their RC10s were identical apart from Nicks being dyed blue and Janes dyed pink. Hows this for battery cooling.
Adams.jpg
Adams.jpg (237.72 KiB) Viewed 1774 times
Adams.jpg
Adams.jpg (237.72 KiB) Viewed 1774 times

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:57 am
by Asso_man!
Awesome article Terry, have you noticed they didn't take care to lighten their rear bottom spring cups :lol:

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:18 am
by Asso_man!
Same idea, different skills :lol:

As seen on Epay right now:

Image

RC10 ASSOCIATED LOT AND PARTS

LOT OF VINTAGE PARTS AND CAR FOR RC10 ASSOCIATED

CHARGERS, GEARS,

SHOCKS , SPRINGS,ROLLING CHASSIS,

MAGNUM JUNIOR RADIO

AND LOTS AND LOTS OF PARTS !!!

Raising money for trip to Disney for kids Christmas present !! Bid generously. Thank You !!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:25 am
by templeofspeed
Looks like Christmas for the kids is gonna suck this year... :!:

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 9:34 am
by Asso_man!
And another one :D

Image

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:24 am
by Halgar
My question is this, is there a noticeable difference in handling, runtime, speed, or anything else by removing material like that? And I mean besides excessive chassis flex (from some of the more extreme examples of hacking )?

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:52 pm
by Asso_man!
Halgar wrote:My question is this, is there a noticeable difference in handling, runtime, speed, or anything else by removing material like that? And I mean besides excessive chassis flex (from some of the more extreme examples of hacking )?
the article Terry has just posted will answer your questions :)

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 1:08 pm
by Halgar
CRAP! You mean I have to read it?!?! :? :x :roll:

:wink: :wink: :P :P :P :mrgreen:

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:23 am
by Dr. Robotnik
Thanks a lot for posting those pics Terry, ZOMG!!!!111!!! look at the lower rear spring cups!
templeofspeed wrote:Looks like Christmas for the kids is gonna suck this year... :!:
Hahahaha

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:26 pm
by scr8p

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:37 pm
by templeofspeed
Who's brave enough to pull the trigger? :shock:

That is a trophy quality chassis.

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:25 pm
by mrlexan
Scr8p beat me too it. Got to love that one.

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:29 pm
by carloco8
templeofspeed wrote:That is a trophy quality chassis.
I agree, looks like a car that saw some good 'ole down in the dirt racing.

Its got a RPM shorty on it too.

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:42 am
by Halgar
Come on, that's cheap at twice the price, it even comes with a second set of rims and tires! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: The official "lightweight" chassis thread.

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:30 am
by templeofspeed
templeofspeed wrote:Who's brave enough to pull the trigger? :shock:
question answered... asa's on it. (nice new id btw.)