Just to follow up, for those who commented and anyone who comes looking for this same topic/info...here's how it went.
Whitening: Overall not a ton of difference, but I feel it is noticeable. Much more so in person, of course...especially outside. (Though, my parts were pretty damn good to begin with, so there's that.)
Before
RC10 nylon by
Evil Jim, on Flickr
After
Fresh nylon parts by
Evil Jim, on Flickr
RC10th wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 7:20 pm
And don't over-do the peroxide or you'll end up with chalky nylon parts.
I used the
sous vide* method, so I don't think there's much issue with that. Additionally, from what I had read while researching the "retrobrite" process and various techniques in the first place, if something ended up chalky...it was probably chalky already. If not noticeably so, just yet.
Hydration: I hadn't seen the comments about order of ops, so the parts sat in water overnight, once they were rinsed clean of all H2O2. Again, not a lot of difference, but I think this is something that's on a scale below most human perception. The one thing I did notice was that the parts sound softer, if that makes any sense. They feel a bit nicer when being handled, but when moved around they don't seem as hard...less "clanky" and more "thuddy" to the ear.
Damage: I had mentioned my concerns about the R&R of hardware causing cracks in the nylon, but I think that will be alleviated by the hydration. I didn't notice much at disassembly, but I was more concerned about the subsequent installation, rather than the removal. The next car I do, I'll try the order suggested by JosephS.
JosephS wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 2:07 pm
Or you could rehydrate them before removing the hardware and whitening so the nylon is less likely crack. Water is a plasticizer for nylon. It shouldn't do any damage to nylon to boil it, though it doesn't help it any either.
I tend to hydrate my parts before whiting so that the nylon doesn't absorb the hydrogen peroxide.
Thnx again for folks' help and comments...on to the build!
*Here's more on my method and why I chose to use a
sous vide over other options.
Other than being able to run the entire process indoors, my three biggest reasons were:
1. Less reliant on weather (here in the PNW)
2. I figured
NOT introducing more UV...even if only to kick off the peroxide decomposition...would be a good thing.
3. Parameters are much more controllable...IOW, repeatable.
My research showed UV was unnecessary, heat being a sufficient catalyst for decomposition. A lot of the "bright sun outdoors" result seems to come from the heat, as much as any UV exposure. Aside from not wanting to use UV in the process, getting the right bulb/lamp was also not cheap. On top of all the rest, it takes far less H2O2 to fill a few zip bags of parts, compared to pan-type vessels. And I saw lots of struggles from people trying to set up their light and tub and reflective surfaces...thinking the UV needed to hit all surfaces...that I just didn't need to deal with.
Instead, I had two quart Ziplocs (of parts), one
sous vide stick, a pot, and some tap water...the whole thing fit easily in my laundry sink. Nothing ever left the pot, so there's no reason you couldn't do this on a counter, or bench as well. I ran the parts at 50°C for 6 hours, checking in about every hour to agitate the bubbles free from the parts and release any built up gases.
And that's one other (IMO, huge) benefit to using this method: there's no need to turn parts, or try to keep them submerged/from floating. Parts go in the bag, fill the bag with H2O2 to cover...only close the top
most of the way...and lower them into your pot of water. As they submerge, the water presses any air out of the bag...so you have full coverage of your parts, before you complete the seal. There are specific racks for keeping bags in place, but I simply clipped the bags to the side of the pot, so they wouldn't be moved around by the current of the
sous vide action.
The only semi-challenging part I decided to undertake, was to purchase food grade H2O2 at a 12% solution. Food grade means you know it's
only peroxide and water, and 12% means you have more peroxide to work with in each batch. I suspect 3% would be enough, but felt this was worth it to ensure a shorter cook would be sufficient. Also, being an aqueous solution means you won't have any streaking problems, from uneven application/coverage of cream-based products on the parts.