Page 3 of 3

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:09 am
by Woobie
Hey Kenooze,

That is some really cool stuff there! Dude, clean that nasty thing up, and get it into running condition again. Take some pictures like you have it now, and restore the damn thing.

What is the point of taking a bunch of dirty dusty parts, and putting them in a glass case??!! Sure, I guess it is RC History, but who cares.......Do what you want, and have fun doing it.

I dont know, sometimes I just do not understand the mentality of keeping something like that, in that condition.....I mean, it's not like you have a museum that people can come and see the parts at.

Fix it up, install some period correct electrics, and dare I even suggest, run the thing once or twice. You dont have to bash it, just run it, and get a sense of what was good about this car.

Take care.

Scott

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:37 am
by uzzi
Anyone want to guess why they went for a belt ontop set-up? I thought it was to run without an undertray....which could explain the body posts as well.

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 3:52 am
by Bormac
Go for it WOOBIE! Its always good to hear another persons ideas on how to keep your collection.

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:09 am
by terry.sc
I would rebuild it, after all just about every other part is standard Procat so not difficult to replace.
uzzi wrote:Anyone want to guess why they went for a belt ontop set-up? I thought it was to run without an undertray....which could explain the body posts as well.
To lower the centre of gravity, so improve the handling. The heaviest part is the batteries, dropping the weight of the batteries by 1/4" makes a lot of difference. It was always designed to run with an undertray.
AD-RS1600i wrote: Where did the Bosscat finish that year? :)
The Bosscat didn't exist then, but one of these development Procats finished 8th overall.

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:23 am
by jeroen206

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 3:41 am
by Bormac
Excellent work Jeroen! Another rare find im sure. I have some of those black shocks shown on the front of that truck too!

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 5:13 am
by isobarik
uzzi wrote:Anyone want to guess why they went for a belt ontop set-up? I thought it was to run without an undertray....which could explain the body posts as well.
To move the cells further to the ground...

mvh Isobariks 8)

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 1:01 am
by Bormac
I just found this picture with the entrant number '512' still on the shell from the 91 detroit 'worlds'. The second pic illustrates the shell,wing and undertray set i sold quite a while ago to fit the Procat. I still have the undertray with matching paint scene on my completely rebuilt car.
Image

Image

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:37 pm
by aip47-2008
What ever happened to this project Cedric? :)

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2014 7:12 am
by kenooze
Nothing :(

Still is the same condition, may be a day ...

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 12:17 pm
by Jay Dub
Hey, just wondering if you may be able to post some pics of what the bumper looks like up close. Thanks -J

Re: Schumacher Boss Cat 1991 Prototype from Detroit

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:44 pm
by V12
kenooze wrote:Great

Could you also make me a scan of this paper work ?
I try to found some informations here in Europe !
I have some Oberle diff for that car and for the Cougar and strange other prototype diff comes from a french Schumacher Team Driver also in Australia 1989 with Pro Cat and Top Cat .
Regarding the Oberle diff, do you have pictures?
I know and have some of his 1/12 parts but never saw such diff.