Page 1 of 1
RPM 2.65 compared to stealth
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:41 am
by Tubs
Has anyone ever compared the two?
Justin
Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:31 am
by Lowgear
What do you mean exactly? Gearing wise? Physical appearance?
Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:40 am
by LowClassCC
seeing the rpm 2.65trans is over 80% stealth what is there to compare? i weighed both and think the rpm was around 3 grams heaver due to the extra case material. the only other real difference is the gear ratio. 2.25 compared to 2.65. the modern rc10b4 has a 2.60 trans. thus for gearing with modern motors you can use the same gearing as they are using as a starting point and pretty much be dead on.
Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:32 pm
by Tubs
Thanks everyone. I was trying to compare the ratios.
Justin
Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:58 am
by ffpm46
Hello,
is speaking of the RPM 2.65 Tranny case and top shaft, Can I mount a B4/T4 slipper on it? If not why?
Thank you
Re: RPM 2.65 compared to stealth
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:22 am
by Lowgear