Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
- JK Racing
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:32 pm
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
scr8p, your right....2.65, gear it the same as you would your B4
--Joey --
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
- mdutcher
- Approved Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:35 am
- Location: Lenexa, KS
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
Beast in the sense of just too much power? Or beast in that it could cause some stress to the tranny and internal gearing? My initial thought was to give me the power that I wanted when I felt that I needed it. I don't plan on going full tilt with it all of the time as I like to modulate speed accordingly here and there.JK Racing wrote:2.25 internals on the stealth....
I'll have to dig up my gearing, but be aware that 3800 is a BEAST, being a 4 pole motor (monster torque, enough for 4X4SC trucks weight 6-8 pounds).
FT RC10B4.2*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*XP
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
- mdutcher
- Approved Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:35 am
- Location: Lenexa, KS
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
Ok, with that said, what would be a good starting point FDR to shoot for? And correct me if I am wrong, but is this how you calculate the FDR.... (Spur / Pinion)*Internal??JK Racing wrote:scr8p, your right....2.65, gear it the same as you would your B4
ex. (81 spur / 30 pinion)*2.65 = 7.155
FT RC10B4.2*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*XP
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
- mdutcher
- Approved Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:35 am
- Location: Lenexa, KS
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
I also do have the option of swapping out the 3800Kv motor for a not as beastly 4600kv one. I just wanted to start somewhere.mdutcher wrote:Beast in the sense of just too much power? Or beast in that it could cause some stress to the tranny and internal gearing? My initial thought was to give me the power that I wanted when I felt that I needed it. I don't plan on going full tilt with it all of the time as I like to modulate speed accordingly here and there.JK Racing wrote:2.25 internals on the stealth....
I'll have to dig up my gearing, but be aware that 3800 is a BEAST, being a 4 pole motor (monster torque, enough for 4X4SC trucks weight 6-8 pounds).
FT RC10B4.2*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*XP
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
- JK Racing
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:32 pm
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
the 4600 is a 4 pole also...more beastly.
as long as you can control your throttle finger, no issues.
your calculations are correct, I havent looked up my gearing yet, but like I said, match what you would use in the B4.
as long as you can control your throttle finger, no issues.
your calculations are correct, I havent looked up my gearing yet, but like I said, match what you would use in the B4.
--Joey --
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
- mdutcher
- Approved Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:35 am
- Location: Lenexa, KS
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
I thought the lower the KV, the more power. So, it is the higher the KV the more power than? I was a little confused.JK Racing wrote:the 4600 is a 4 pole also...more beastly.
as long as you can control your throttle finger, no issues.
your calculations are correct, I havent looked up my gearing yet, but like I said, match what you would use in the B4.
I will start with what I have in my B4 than.
FT RC10B4.2*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*XP
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
- Charlie don't surf
- Approved Member
- Posts: 8958
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 49 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
Yup, the KV (killavolt) number is how many RPM it will turn for every volt of input power. A lower "Turn" number ie a 6.5 makes more power than a 22.5 because of less resistance-mdutcher wrote:I thought the lower the KV, the more power. So, it is the higher the KV the more power than? I was a little confused.JK Racing wrote:the 4600 is a 4 pole also...more beastly.
as long as you can control your throttle finger, no issues.
your calculations are correct, I havent looked up my gearing yet, but like I said, match what you would use in the B4.
I will start with what I have in my B4 than.
- RC104ever
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1506
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 3:34 pm
- Location: Burlington, Ontario - Canada
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
Keep in mind that we are talking about two different ways of measuring power:
kv - the HIGHER the KV, the faster it will turn, but you will have less torque than a lower kv motor (all else being equal)
Turns - the LOWER the turn number, (ie 6.5 vs 10.5), the faster it will turn but it will also have a lower torque number (all else being equal)
So in your initial example, the 4600 kv motor should make your vehicle move faster (more top speed) but it would have less torque than the 3800 kv.
Similarly, a 7.5T motor would be faster than a 13.5T motor but the 13.5T would have more low end torque.
I believe this is why crawlers and heavier vehicles typically use motors with higher Turn ratings or lower kv numbers.
Someone correct me if my above statements are incorrect but that's my understanding.
kv - the HIGHER the KV, the faster it will turn, but you will have less torque than a lower kv motor (all else being equal)
Turns - the LOWER the turn number, (ie 6.5 vs 10.5), the faster it will turn but it will also have a lower torque number (all else being equal)
So in your initial example, the 4600 kv motor should make your vehicle move faster (more top speed) but it would have less torque than the 3800 kv.
Similarly, a 7.5T motor would be faster than a 13.5T motor but the 13.5T would have more low end torque.
I believe this is why crawlers and heavier vehicles typically use motors with higher Turn ratings or lower kv numbers.
Someone correct me if my above statements are incorrect but that's my understanding.
- Chris
Lots of cars...so many cars
Lots of cars...so many cars
- JK Racing
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:32 pm
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
my understand is almost opposite...
lower KV - lower RPM - lower "watts" or power
maybe?
lower KV - lower RPM - lower "watts" or power
maybe?
--Joey --
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
- Phin
- Approved Member
- Posts: 2748
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 10:17 pm
- Location: NY²
- Has thanked: 70 times
- Been thanked: 194 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
KV*V=~RPM under no load.
A low turn # (e.g. 3.5T) has a higher KV rating than a higher turn # (e.g. 21.5T).
So lower turn motors have faster top end speeds than higher turn motors but lower KV motors have slower top end speeds than higher KV motors. For acceleration it's the opposite.
A low turn # (e.g. 3.5T) has a higher KV rating than a higher turn # (e.g. 21.5T).
So lower turn motors have faster top end speeds than higher turn motors but lower KV motors have slower top end speeds than higher KV motors. For acceleration it's the opposite.
- JK Racing
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:32 pm
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Has thanked: 114 times
- Been thanked: 216 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
finally found what I was looking for...KV/Watts chart...I understand these are Novak motors on the chart, but it should hold true for any motor, as KV goes up, so does watts (or horsepower as I understand it). It may not really be a direct link to torque, but it is as close as I can come to explain my understanding.
--Joey --
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
Vintage A&L and Factory Works
Old School Racer & Vintage RC Car nut
JKRacingRC.com
- mdutcher
- Approved Member
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:35 am
- Location: Lenexa, KS
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
I think that you guys are all saying the same thing. Regardless, it would seem that the higher the Kv, the faster the motor is, when talking about top end speed - this is where I was slightly misguided prior to my post a few days ago. I do appreciate the clarification though.JK Racing wrote:finally found what I was looking for...KV/Watts chart...I understand these are Novak motors on the chart, but it should hold true for any motor, as KV goes up, so does watts (or horsepower as I understand it). It may not really be a direct link to torque, but it is as close as I can come to explain my understanding.
FT RC10B4.2*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*XP
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
RC10 Re-Re*Dualsky ESC*Reedy 17.5T*Savox
RC10 CE*Novak GTB2*Dualsky 13.5T*XP
RC10T and other vintage goodness
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
back to the question at hand, power/gearing.
you want to run a 10.5(4200kv) motor (i wouldn't use castle, but thats your call).
using novaks final drive chart http://v2.teamnovak.com/kb/knowledgebase.php?act=art&article_id=29
you want to be at a final drive of 8. using a 81 tooth spur you'll need a 22 tooth pinion.
keep in mind that this is a starting point, you can go up or down as needed just monitot temps.
you don't want a 540 sized bl motor to hit the 170 range.
you want to run a 10.5(4200kv) motor (i wouldn't use castle, but thats your call).
using novaks final drive chart http://v2.teamnovak.com/kb/knowledgebase.php?act=art&article_id=29
you want to be at a final drive of 8. using a 81 tooth spur you'll need a 22 tooth pinion.
keep in mind that this is a starting point, you can go up or down as needed just monitot temps.
you don't want a 540 sized bl motor to hit the 170 range.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:20 pm
- Location: Houston
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
I've got a 4000kv 8.5T motor and I personally think it is way too much power. I'm probably going to go down to a 13.5.
Raborn Racing Originals Shapeways store
Re: Modernizing your RC10 - question regarding electronics
fred is that a hobbywing motor? most 8.5's are around 5000kv.
i find 10.5 the perfect mod motor for 2wd. i tried a novak 8.5 (5000kv) and it was crazy, but the 10.5 seems just right.
i find 10.5 the perfect mod motor for 2wd. i tried a novak 8.5 (5000kv) and it was crazy, but the 10.5 seems just right.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 90 Replies
- 40866 Views
-
Last post by bigrobbyt
-
- 19 Replies
- 7285 Views
-
Last post by covell2
-
- 7 Replies
- 1966 Views
-
Last post by steph
-
- 8 Replies
- 1838 Views
-
Last post by Zedmaster
-
- 32 Replies
- 6548 Views
-
Last post by BooGTS
-
- 23 Replies
- 3875 Views
-
Last post by erichevy
-
- 11 Replies
- 1714 Views
-
Last post by THUNDERSTRIKE1
-
- 10 Replies
- 2353 Views
-
Last post by GoMachV
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: CommonCrawl [Bot] and 1 guest