Hey everybody,
I have this cool old direct drive type tranny, for the RC10. I think it is Trackmaster, but not 100% certain.
Getting to my question: What exactly was this type of tranny best used for? And why? Thanks for any help.
Scott
Trackmaster RC10 Tranny- What Was It Best Used For?
DIRECT DRIVE
Used for dirt and some places on asphault race tracks. A t times mounteed backwards for more of a mid motor setup.That was a help in balancing weight.
A few places run on carpet,my favorite is dirt, hope this helps,GRIZZLY
A few places run on carpet,my favorite is dirt, hope this helps,GRIZZLY
IT'S BEEN A LONG, HARD ROAD. I HAVE RISEN FROM THE ASHES.
- Eau Rouge
- Approved Member
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:59 pm
- Location: Aurora, Illinois
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Most TrackMasters were belt drives, and not many were direct drive, so it's something that definitely wasn't seen often.
Direct drive was very oval oriented, for sure. Dirt oval guys loved the TM diffs, for the smoothnesss that they applied the power down. The biggest problems with DD trannies are that you need to use a large spur gear and a VERY small pinion to get a decent drive ratio for most modified motors. In doing that, the drive axles wind up sitting up really high in the CG, and put the dogbones at a real severe angle towards the rear outer half-shafts. It made for almost as much driveline friction as running a smooth gearbox.
I have a belt drive version at home, and it's a novelty today. It might go in a Bomber car (old school gold tub with a late 50's sedan body) I'm building for dirt oval, if I can find some better lower mounting plates than it has right now. There are better diffs out there of that era, though. It did find it's way into A LOT of dirt oval cars in the '80s.
Direct drive was very oval oriented, for sure. Dirt oval guys loved the TM diffs, for the smoothnesss that they applied the power down. The biggest problems with DD trannies are that you need to use a large spur gear and a VERY small pinion to get a decent drive ratio for most modified motors. In doing that, the drive axles wind up sitting up really high in the CG, and put the dogbones at a real severe angle towards the rear outer half-shafts. It made for almost as much driveline friction as running a smooth gearbox.
I have a belt drive version at home, and it's a novelty today. It might go in a Bomber car (old school gold tub with a late 50's sedan body) I'm building for dirt oval, if I can find some better lower mounting plates than it has right now. There are better diffs out there of that era, though. It did find it's way into A LOT of dirt oval cars in the '80s.
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 1024 Views
-
Last post by aeiou
-
- 11 Replies
- 2540 Views
-
Last post by bigmoose
-
- 4 Replies
- 675 Views
-
Last post by joey_zrl
-
- 4 Replies
- 1445 Views
-
Last post by joeyskates
-
- 3 Replies
- 936 Views
-
Last post by RC104ever
-
- 4 Replies
- 2842 Views
-
Last post by bully
-
- 4 Replies
- 932 Views
-
Last post by burnsmonkey
-
- 5 Replies
- 1166 Views
-
Last post by jwscab
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests