Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

For all things R/C, post '90s to today.

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

Post Reply
jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

I know this may have been asked before, but are they the same?
If I break something at the track could I replace it with an associated part?
I'm thinking about getting one. Is there anything I should know about beforehand?
Can associated "hop ups" like threaded shocks and etc be used on it?

I don't want to get it and have it be comparable to a duratrash product.

Thanks!!!

Charlie don't surf
Approved Member
Posts: 8921
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by Charlie don't surf »

Some of it's the same- The TT Phoenix Bx3 uses Metric hardware and bearings vs "Imperial" sizes (or S.A.E) the plastic is pretty soft and the towers and shocks are way different- some parts are 100% interchangeable though like caster blocks, toe blocks, front and rear chassis and bulkheads, I think someone said the trans case was different- the front wheels are different as are the steering knuckles.

jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

I'm just curious that's all. If I dont find an Associated buggy relatively cheap, Ill grab one of them and give it a try.

User avatar
Lonestar
Approved Member
Posts: 4270
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:17 am
Location: Switzerland, yannow, in Europe (or almost)
Has thanked: 626 times
Been thanked: 167 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by Lonestar »

I think the AT10 and the Phoenix are darn close...

Here's what I wrote about the AT10 a few months ago.

http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=24074

Paul
AE RC10 - Made In The Eighties, Loved By The Ladies.
Blue Was Better - now, Blue Is Bankrupt.
Facebook affiliate program manager: "They go out and find the morons for me".
Life is short. Waste it wisely.

jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

Thanks alot for the input, I appreciate it.
Not trying to start an argument, but I've noticed that name brand rtr's have problems too. Losi, duratrax, (some, not many) associated.
Maybe its just the way it goes, Like a car built on a monday or friday. :lol:
I will keep the shock issues and other things you have stated in mind though. Fortunately for me I have extra shocks. I dont know if they will fit the phoenix/b3. But if i get one I'll try it.

jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

Charlie don't surf wrote: some parts are 100% interchangeable though like caster blocks, toe blocks, front and rear chassis and bulkheads.
Does that mean you could use basically the front and rear parts of the associated? Like swap over the AE front and rear bulkheads and use AE front and rear a-arms?

This is the kind of stuff I'm curious about, Some people would think I'm dumb if I did it. But I think it would be kind of neat. Kind of like a "custom" buggy.

And usually I just have to be different. At the local track, almost everyone races the losi 22 buggy. I tried one and didnt like it. Mid motor just handled weird to me. I'm used to rear motor like the RC10T and similar. I have the XXX-SCT and I hate it. Its rear motor, but it seems to me like that truck just doesnt drive right. But I'm used to the stadium trucks.

User avatar
EvolutionRevolution
Approved Member
Posts: 1495
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by EvolutionRevolution »

Is the slipper assembly metric or imperial (layshaft diameter)? And does it use a pin or a flat spot on the layshaft?

Okay, and is the slipper crap or not? If it's crap, don't bother answering the previous questions, just say it's crap.

Charlie don't surf
Approved Member
Posts: 8921
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by Charlie don't surf »

EvolutionRevolution wrote: Okay, and is the slipper crap or not? If it's crap, don't bother answering the previous questions, just say it's crap.
Paul called it a perfectly functioning light switch-

jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

I might have to get one and review it. Thank God tower hobbies has easy pay! :D

User avatar
EvolutionRevolution
Approved Member
Posts: 1495
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by EvolutionRevolution »

Charlie don't surf wrote:
EvolutionRevolution wrote: Okay, and is the slipper crap or not? If it's crap, don't bother answering the previous questions, just say it's crap.
Paul called it a perfectly functioning light switch-
Never mind then.

User avatar
flipwils11
Approved Member
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:30 pm
Location: St Paul, MN
Been thanked: 15 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by flipwils11 »

I've purchased a few Thunder Tiger Phoenix buggy parts for my RC10B3, both the runner/basher/racer and my blue Factory Team shelfer project. The aluminum front hub carriers, steering blocks, and rear trans/bulkhead metal brace were compatible. The rear suspension arm mounts were not compatible with the Associated rear trans mount/plate so Jake/bigjeepz milled it for me. Also the trans outdrive hubs are compatible with the stealth.

The RC10B3's are so cheap and plentiful I'd still prefer to have one of those and augment with any Thunder Tiger parts if I had to find something.

jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

I ended up getting a B4 really cheap. The guy I got it from had a lot of money in to it. Just the carbon chassis alone was $70. The only thing I have to do to it is fix/figure out the steering. It turns fully one way, (cant remember if its right or left) but comes up a little short on the opposite side.

User avatar
Lonestar
Approved Member
Posts: 4270
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:17 am
Location: Switzerland, yannow, in Europe (or almost)
Has thanked: 626 times
Been thanked: 167 times

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by Lonestar »

jayman24 wrote: Just the carbon chassis alone was $70..

mmh.... :?
AE RC10 - Made In The Eighties, Loved By The Ladies.
Blue Was Better - now, Blue Is Bankrupt.
Facebook affiliate program manager: "They go out and find the morons for me".
Life is short. Waste it wisely.

jayman24
Approved Member
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Thunder Tiger Phoenix Vs RC10B3

Post by jayman24 »

I think the guy had the tag for the chassis in the box. Ill look later.

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “21st Century Modern”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests