B4.5
Re: B4.5
Good luck on the track.
Javier -
RC10 Shelfer, RC10 Worlds Car Runner, RC10T Shelfer, RC10T2 Runner, SC18, JConcepts BJ4, B5M and counting.
RC10T WOIN Build http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=32541
RC10 Shelfer, RC10 Worlds Car Runner, RC10T Shelfer, RC10T2 Runner, SC18, JConcepts BJ4, B5M and counting.
RC10T WOIN Build http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=32541
- soniccj5
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:23 pm
- Location: Massachusetts
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: B4.5
It looks cool I am sure there is a better explanation, maybe something about better balance or something.RichieRich wrote:Really cool. Remind me what the deal is with the narrow chassis that is so popular now?
- GreenHell
- Approved Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:48 pm
- Location: Detroit
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: B4.5
Track Report:
Well I made it to Trackside Raceway http://tracksideraceway.com/ in Brookfield, WI Friday night for a club race. With the Spektrum race coming the following weekend the place was packed. The surface is black dirt (with possibly some clay mixed in) slightly damp and high-bite. And the layout was simple but very fast with nothing too technical, think on-road with jumps.
Besides testing the new chassis I’m also working on a lightweight transmission setup for 17.5 stock (eliminated the slipper, 64p spur/pinion, aluminum top shaft and narrowed idler & diff gear). Throttle response feels more like a mild mod motor than a numb blinky-stock and carries more speed down straight as well, but I don’t think it will be effective in less than high-bite conditions without a slipper.
On to the chassis, besides getting lots of attention in the pit area it proved to be durable. In my first practice session I drove into the high-speed sweeper too hot, traction rolled, tumbled through the air and went into the boards without a scratch (was quite spectacular). I started with the same setup and tire combo I run with the +8 factory chassis. After I got the new track layout somewhat figured out and got comfortable, the car felt light and agile but the balance was off. The rear-end was locked down and the front pushed pretty hard on corner mid-to-exit, with the old car this was never a problem and I usually had to dial steering out. After trying a few different sets of tires and adding a little weight the car got better and as the race day progressed the track dried out slightly which also helped. Some how I managed to make it into the A-main and finished mid pack, pretty decent for its first time out but still off pace. In hind sight I wish I made the car shorter (+8mm instead of +10mm) and didn’t limit myself to a shorty pack in the far forward position (see version 2.0). I still plan on using it at the upcoming Spektrum race and am confident I can get it to work as good as the factory chassis.
Well I made it to Trackside Raceway http://tracksideraceway.com/ in Brookfield, WI Friday night for a club race. With the Spektrum race coming the following weekend the place was packed. The surface is black dirt (with possibly some clay mixed in) slightly damp and high-bite. And the layout was simple but very fast with nothing too technical, think on-road with jumps.
Besides testing the new chassis I’m also working on a lightweight transmission setup for 17.5 stock (eliminated the slipper, 64p spur/pinion, aluminum top shaft and narrowed idler & diff gear). Throttle response feels more like a mild mod motor than a numb blinky-stock and carries more speed down straight as well, but I don’t think it will be effective in less than high-bite conditions without a slipper.
On to the chassis, besides getting lots of attention in the pit area it proved to be durable. In my first practice session I drove into the high-speed sweeper too hot, traction rolled, tumbled through the air and went into the boards without a scratch (was quite spectacular). I started with the same setup and tire combo I run with the +8 factory chassis. After I got the new track layout somewhat figured out and got comfortable, the car felt light and agile but the balance was off. The rear-end was locked down and the front pushed pretty hard on corner mid-to-exit, with the old car this was never a problem and I usually had to dial steering out. After trying a few different sets of tires and adding a little weight the car got better and as the race day progressed the track dried out slightly which also helped. Some how I managed to make it into the A-main and finished mid pack, pretty decent for its first time out but still off pace. In hind sight I wish I made the car shorter (+8mm instead of +10mm) and didn’t limit myself to a shorty pack in the far forward position (see version 2.0). I still plan on using it at the upcoming Spektrum race and am confident I can get it to work as good as the factory chassis.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 8921
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: B4.5
That facility looks killer!
And the "speedy's" cut gears and the slipper eliminator is a great idea too!
My testing drove me to the conclusion that the chassis has to have a good amount of flex with the +10mm
And the "speedy's" cut gears and the slipper eliminator is a great idea too!
My testing drove me to the conclusion that the chassis has to have a good amount of flex with the +10mm
- GreenHell
- Approved Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:48 pm
- Location: Detroit
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: B4.5
Torsionally the +10mm printed chassis feels similar to the +8mm AE. I made the battery box area extra thick and added a bulkhead behind the battery to tie it together. I’m thinking some of the balance issues the car has is because I moved too much weight forward and the car doesn't want to rotate, the added length doesn't help either.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 8921
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: B4.5
I lost about 40% torsional rigidity when I narrowed the truck chassis, which really helped the initial turn in, and the length stabilized it after that-
- GreenHell
- Approved Member
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:48 pm
- Location: Detroit
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: B4.5
One thing I forgot to mention…
Some of the fastest most consistent buggies in the building Friday were mid-motor Centro C4.2 converted B4s, even after the track dried out some they still looked planted. I’m afraid most of this work was for nothing.
Some of the fastest most consistent buggies in the building Friday were mid-motor Centro C4.2 converted B4s, even after the track dried out some they still looked planted. I’m afraid most of this work was for nothing.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 8921
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: B4.5
Added some droop to both ends to compensate for the extra chassis movement, kept all the ballast weight the same except the front end, where I increased it to 3/4 ozGreenHell wrote:Did you change your setup much from the B4 to the narrowed T4 chassis?
I'm ready to see a direct drive 17.5 B4.2.....
Re: B4.5
That's nice, but have you thought about also running MIP's new 17.5 Pucks system for even less rotating mass. I run those now and they have made a difference. I just picked up some of the Speedy diff and idler gears for my truck and buggy.
Javier -
RC10 Shelfer, RC10 Worlds Car Runner, RC10T Shelfer, RC10T2 Runner, SC18, JConcepts BJ4, B5M and counting.
RC10T WOIN Build http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=32541
RC10 Shelfer, RC10 Worlds Car Runner, RC10T Shelfer, RC10T2 Runner, SC18, JConcepts BJ4, B5M and counting.
RC10T WOIN Build http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=32541
Re: B4.5
I would love to see that and give it a try.I'm ready to see a direct drive 17.5 B4.2.....
Javier -
RC10 Shelfer, RC10 Worlds Car Runner, RC10T Shelfer, RC10T2 Runner, SC18, JConcepts BJ4, B5M and counting.
RC10T WOIN Build http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=32541
RC10 Shelfer, RC10 Worlds Car Runner, RC10T Shelfer, RC10T2 Runner, SC18, JConcepts BJ4, B5M and counting.
RC10T WOIN Build http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=32541
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 8921
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: B4.5
It's the only thing that hasn't come full circlejanaya wrote:I would love to see that and give it a try.I'm ready to see a direct drive 17.5 B4.2.....
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest