What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20/11)

General discussion, builds/restorations, etc...

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16527
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 957 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by scr8p »

it's hard to believe it's been over 3 years since paul and i hashed out this "old is new" idea. i'm sure chad at dynotech was pleased with how many set of those klein arms he sold. :wink:

but i think it's about time someone comes up with something else. old is new is starting to just get old. :lol:

who wants to take on the development of a "new to old" b4 build? a short arm b4 with jelly bean rims and big 'ol knobby tires. gold ano'd shocks, and a protech body. see where i'm going........

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by aeiou »

scr8p wrote:it's hard to believe it's been over 3 years since paul and i hashed out this "old is new" idea. i'm sure chad at dynotech was pleased with how many set of those klein arms he sold. :wink:

but i think it's about time someone comes up with something else. old is new is starting to just get old. :lol:

who wants to take on the development of a "new to old" b4 build? a short arm b4 with jelly bean rims and big 'ol knobby tires. gold ano'd shocks, and a protech body. see where i'm going........
I love it! :D I'm pretty sure I have most of a B4 roller around here that would be a good starting point... :mrgreen:

Maybe call it the "B4 the after" build. :wink:

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16527
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 957 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by scr8p »

i can almost guarantee it won't have the following as the old is new stuff. :lol:

to be honest, it's not so much that the old is new builds are getting old. it's more the fact that no one really deviated from the parts list. yes, there was a few guys that went the stock rear arm/b4 hub route. but that's really the only 2 versions.

i can't remember who it was, but there was only one guy that took the concept, and used losi xx or xxx rear arms.

User avatar
RC104ever
Approved Member
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Burlington, Ontario - Canada
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by RC104ever »

Are the dynotech arms similar to the RPM arms? They look very similar other than the colour.
- Chris
Lots of cars...so many cars

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16527
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 957 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by scr8p »

RC104ever wrote:Thanks - I did read through the posts and found that it did answer some of my questions, but I guess I'm looking for some specifics.
RC104ever wrote:Are the dynotech arms similar to the RPM arms? They look very similar other than the colour.
time to re-read thread. :wink:

hint: first post, page 13.

Charlie don't surf
Approved Member
Posts: 8921
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
Location: USA
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by Charlie don't surf »

scr8p wrote:
RC104ever wrote:Thanks - I did read through the posts and found that it did answer some of my questions, but I guess I'm looking for some specifics.
RC104ever wrote:Are the dynotech arms similar to the RPM arms? They look very similar other than the colour.
time to re-read thread. :wink:

hint: first post, page 13.
Wait, what-?

User avatar
RC104ever
Approved Member
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Burlington, Ontario - Canada
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by RC104ever »

scr8p wrote:
RC104ever wrote:Thanks - I did read through the posts and found that it did answer some of my questions, but I guess I'm looking for some specifics.
RC104ever wrote:Are the dynotech arms similar to the RPM arms? They look very similar other than the colour.
time to re-read thread. :wink:

hint: first post, page 13.
Oops, sorry my bad! Thanks :)
- Chris
Lots of cars...so many cars

User avatar
Bormac
Approved Member
Posts: 3112
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:52 pm
Location: CENTRAL COAST, NSW AUSTRALIA
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by Bormac »

Stunning! :D
-Jason.

Still known as- bormac

My collection-http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom.asp?id=10980

fredswain
Approved Member
Posts: 1167
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:20 pm
Location: Houston
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by fredswain »

scr8p wrote:i can almost guarantee it won't have the following as the old is new stuff. :lol:

to be honest, it's not so much that the old is new builds are getting old. it's more the fact that no one really deviated from the parts list. yes, there was a few guys that went the stock rear arm/b4 hub route. but that's really the only 2 versions.

i can't remember who it was, but there was only one guy that took the concept, and used losi xx or xxx rear arms.
I've been playing around with other options. The Losi JRX-Pro SE front arms have the same offset as the RPM world's arms but are ever so slightly longer. When you use them with the RC10B4 front caster blocks and steering hubs, the wheel offset works out perfectly when using B4 rims. No need to run wide axles. The RC10T front bulkhead needs to be filed down a bit to clear the arms though. I am also retrofitting some Schumacher big bore shocks on the car right now. The front of my car is turning into a Frankenstein combination of parts. In the end I would rather have an all Associated car and am playing with other options just for the fun of it but I already had these parts lying around to try and just thought it was a neat combination.
Raborn Racing Originals Shapeways store

User avatar
RC104ever
Approved Member
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Burlington, Ontario - Canada
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by RC104ever »

So I just re-read the entire thread - hopefully I didn't miss anything but one thing that I didn't see was anyone trying to use the stock rear axles and the new JC Racing 2.2" wheels and some kind of CVD.

I ask because this is where I'm currently stuck. I bought 3 sets of these wheels (one in each colour, lol) and I also bought the MIP RC10 CVD kit from Tower. Unfortunately, the CVD's are too short to use with my Stealth tranny and they keep popping out of the outdrives.

I think the B4 CVD's would work, but they seem to be too long (tested at LHS). I really want to keep those stock rear axles if possible. I have the RPM rear arms as well.

Any input / suggestions would be welcome!
- Chris
Lots of cars...so many cars

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by aeiou »

RC104ever wrote:So I just re-read the entire thread - hopefully I didn't miss anything but one thing that I didn't see was anyone trying to use the stock rear axles and the new JC Racing 2.2" wheels and some kind of CVD.

I ask because this is where I'm currently stuck. I bought 3 sets of these wheels (one in each colour, lol) and I also bought the MIP RC10 CVD kit from Tower. Unfortunately, the CVD's are too short to use with my Stealth tranny and they keep popping out of the outdrives.

I think the B4 CVD's would work, but they seem to be too long (tested at LHS). I really want to keep those stock rear axles if possible. I have the RPM rear arms as well.

Any input / suggestions would be welcome!
If you are using the JC wheels that are for the RC10 (not the ones for the B4), the offset is such that you can use the stock rear arms. Then you can just use the entire MIP CVD kit.

User avatar
RC104ever
Approved Member
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Burlington, Ontario - Canada
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by RC104ever »

aeiou wrote: If you are using the JC wheels that are for the RC10 (not the ones for the B4), the offset is such that you can use the stock rear arms. Then you can just use the entire MIP CVD kit.
I am using the RC10 JC Racing wheels that fit the original axles / offset etc. I figured the MIP CVD kit would work, and although it does fit, the issue is that the dog bones are too short to work properly with the stealth tranny, unless I do something with the shocks to keep the rear arms at a certain height.

Isn't there a way to extend the dog bones?
- Chris
Lots of cars...so many cars

adam lancia
Approved Member
Posts: 1116
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:37 pm
Location: Donkin, Nova Scotia, Canada
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by adam lancia »

You could always cut them and braze a piece in the middle to get the length you're looking for. But there's gotta be a length of CVD bone that makes that work. How much more length do you need?









(Yeah I know THUMB, *loaded* question... :lol: )

User avatar
RC104ever
Approved Member
Posts: 1506
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Burlington, Ontario - Canada
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by RC104ever »

adam lancia wrote:You could always cut them and braze a piece in the middle to get the length you're looking for. But there's gotta be a length of CVD bone that makes that work. How much more length do you need?

(Yeah I know THUMB, *loaded* question... :lol: )
I need about 1/4" more roughly, maybe could get away with 1/2" but how do you braze a piece in? I remember reading it here somewhere.
- Chris
Lots of cars...so many cars

User avatar
aeiou
Approved Member
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 4:04 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: What was old is… still old, but a lot newer (Update 2/20

Post by aeiou »

Which rear hubs are you using?

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • 6 gear update to newer slipper clutch?
    by Twin Detonator » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    6 Replies
    1279 Views
    Last post by fredswain
  • Charging newer batteries
    by wmcwings » » in Modern Electronics
    14 Replies
    1582 Views
    Last post by Russ Winn
  • TC3 vs. newer TC5/6/7 or others
    by OldSchoolGuy » » in Associated On-Road Forum
    10 Replies
    353 Views
    Last post by OldSchoolGuy
  • RichieRich's still old but newer RC10
    by RichieRich » » in RC10 Buggy Forum
    75 Replies
    7125 Views
    Last post by Bo Wallen
  • Better Looking Bodies for Newer Buggies???
    by USAPaulo » » in 21st Century Modern
    11 Replies
    1473 Views
    Last post by USAPaulo
  • Toolmans Ten's/ newer pics,ones you can see
    by toolman72 » » in The Gallery
    1 Replies
    1149 Views
    Last post by toolman72
  • Newer brands of 1/12 Foams - what are your experiences etc.
    by drbelleville » » in R/C Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    0 Replies
    439 Views
    Last post by drbelleville
  • Old school Yokomo and the newer kits....
    by Hotrodvw » » in Yokomo Forum
    23 Replies
    2739 Views
    Last post by stickboy007

Return to “RC10 Buggy Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No User AvatarAhrefs [Bot], No User AvatarAmazon [Bot] and 45 guests