No man, no it doesn't! LOLjwscab wrote:yeah, once you understand the fact that these 'engineers' design the cars to be assembled, and not disassembled, it helps alleviate some of the cursing.

No man, no it doesn't! LOLjwscab wrote:yeah, once you understand the fact that these 'engineers' design the cars to be assembled, and not disassembled, it helps alleviate some of the cursing.
klavy69 wrote:... when I give you s&#t its a loan...I want it back!
crap happensbadhoopty wrote:yay me.
i keep telling myself it probably needed a new pump anyway...
klavy69 wrote:... when I give you s&#t its a loan...I want it back!
piston slap?Halgar wrote:The engine was replaced at 15K because GM decided to engineer their 350s to knock.
The shop said that it was piston slap. The funny thing is that the service manager didn't want to give me the time of day about it, so he put one of the techs in the truck with me for the test drive. We got to chatting about it and the tech agreed with me, that they'd been building knock free engines for 75 years, and you don't pay the kind of money they're asking for these rigs only to have piston slap and a reduced lifespan because of it. The replacement started to clatter a bit too, but this time it only does it periodically and for a short period of time. The original always knocked whether it was cold or hot.badhoopty wrote:piston slap?
with piston slap, from what i read it wasnt the engineering, it was the acceptable range of tolerances when matching pistons to cylinders that GM changed to save a buck.
klavy69 wrote:... when I give you s&#t its a loan...I want it back!
Isn't that one of those unwritten rulesHalgar wrote: Of course, we had to take it wheeling a few times while we had it.![]()
badhoopty wrote:piston slap?Halgar wrote:The engine was replaced at 15K because GM decided to engineer their 350s to knock.
with piston slap, from what i read it wasnt the engineering, it was the acceptable range of tolerances when matching pistons to cylinders that GM changed to save a buck.
Everyone of us has had a moment like this...probably several. LOL!badhoopty wrote:
yay me.
I understand the need and premise of a union, however they've gone from trying to protect workers to raping business and government, in turn screwing the majority so that their minority are well cared for. I personally think that ALL unions should be abolished and instead mandate and enforce lawful treatment of employees.xanadu wrote: In the end it will go down in history as a great company destroyed by a greedy union.
klavy69 wrote:... when I give you s&#t its a loan...I want it back!
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot],
curl [Bot] and 8 guests