2009 auto engine of the year
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:00 pm
- Location: Otago New Zealand
- Been thanked: 1 time
2009 auto engine of the year
This year's winners are:
* 2-litre TFSI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Audi A4)
* 3-litre TFSI supercharged DOHC V-6 (Audi S4)
* 3-litre DOHC I-6 turbodiesel (BMW 335d)
* 2.5-litre DOHC I-4 hybrid (Ford Fusion Hybrid)
* 3.5-litre EcoBoost turbocharged DOHC V-6 (Ford Taurus SHO)
* 2.4-litre Ecotec DOHC I-4 (Chevrolet Equinox)
* 4.6-litre Tau DOHC V-8 (Hyundai Genesis)
* 2.5-litre turbocharged DOHC H-4 (Subaru Legacy 2.5GT)
* 1.8-litre DOHC I-4 Hybrid (Toyota Prius)
* 2-litre SOHC I-4 Turbo diesel (Volkswagen Jetta TDI).
Only one V8 on the list and it's made in cough...cough..Asia..notice that there aren't alot of normally aspirated engines on the list..
* 2-litre TFSI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Audi A4)
* 3-litre TFSI supercharged DOHC V-6 (Audi S4)
* 3-litre DOHC I-6 turbodiesel (BMW 335d)
* 2.5-litre DOHC I-4 hybrid (Ford Fusion Hybrid)
* 3.5-litre EcoBoost turbocharged DOHC V-6 (Ford Taurus SHO)
* 2.4-litre Ecotec DOHC I-4 (Chevrolet Equinox)
* 4.6-litre Tau DOHC V-8 (Hyundai Genesis)
* 2.5-litre turbocharged DOHC H-4 (Subaru Legacy 2.5GT)
* 1.8-litre DOHC I-4 Hybrid (Toyota Prius)
* 2-litre SOHC I-4 Turbo diesel (Volkswagen Jetta TDI).
Only one V8 on the list and it's made in cough...cough..Asia..notice that there aren't alot of normally aspirated engines on the list..
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: Upstate NY
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
I love mine(in a VW GTI though). Forced induction seems to be more of a necessity/standard these days than a luxury. Who needs all those extra cylinders and pushrod thingies when you can slap a turbo on to a small engine and get hp and fuel economy in a smaller space?tizeye wrote:This year's winners are:
* 2-litre TFSI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Audi A4)
Only one V8 on the list and it's made in cough...cough..Asia..notice that there aren't alot of normally aspirated engines on the list..
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
[quote="aconsolaI love mine(in a VW GTI though). Forced induction seems to be more of a necessity/standard these days than a luxury. Who needs all those extra cylinders and pushrod thingies when you can slap a turbo on to a small engine and get hp and fuel economy in a smaller space?[/quote]
Know what you mean. Recently slapped a supercharger on my MX5 ("Miata" in the US) which more than doubled the horse power to about 230bhp/ton....goes like s**t of a shovel...
Know what you mean. Recently slapped a supercharger on my MX5 ("Miata" in the US) which more than doubled the horse power to about 230bhp/ton....goes like s**t of a shovel...
- SoloGraphix
- Approved Member
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:25 pm
- Location: New F'n Jerzey!
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
I just have to mention that this is a great use of the english language, and a term I had not heard before, but will be sure to use frequently now. Thanks for the chuckleCNA75 wrote:goes like s**t off a shovel...

An a side not I have a WRX and that little H-4 banger with a turbo definitely gets and goes, it is however sluggish compared to the Twin Turbo 6 Cyl Dodge Stealth I was driving before it. The stealth was on her last leg and the wife wanted to make sure my car was more family oriented for the future so I picked up the WRX.
- shodog
- Approved Member
- Posts: 3813
- Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:09 pm
- Location: Washington
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
Theres no replacement for displacement. There is nothing like a tire roasting launch from V8 motor. The Corvette has a large V8 and still gets 28 MPG. None of my V6 or 4 cyl turbo cars any where near that MPG.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:09 pm
- Location: Upstate NY
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
I agree with the fun of a v-8(which is why I am hoping that GM actually produces the camaro convertible), but for everyday driving a small displacement hi-tech turbo is a great thing. the 2010 vette is rated 16/26 and GTI is 24/32 city/highway.
now if I could only get golf practicality with corvette power levels. . .
now if I could only get golf practicality with corvette power levels. . .
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 3877
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
- Has thanked: 169 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
ls2 gto...aconsola wrote:I agree with the fun of a v-8(which is why I am hoping that GM actually produces the camaro convertible), but for everyday driving a small displacement hi-tech turbo is a great thing. the 2010 vette is rated 16/26 and GTI is 24/32 city/highway.
now if I could only get golf practicality with corvette power levels. . .
- mrlexan
- Approved Member
- Posts: 6250
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:49 pm
- Location: Upstate SC
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
badhoopty wrote:ls2 gto...aconsola wrote:I agree with the fun of a v-8(which is why I am hoping that GM actually produces the camaro convertible), but for everyday driving a small displacement hi-tech turbo is a great thing. the 2010 vette is rated 16/26 and GTI is 24/32 city/highway.
now if I could only get golf practicality with corvette power levels. . .


I am not here cause I am playing photographer and on my mountain bike.
www.gojammedia.com
www.gojammedia.com
- HotRodJosh
- Approved Member
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 1:55 pm
- Location: Spanaway, Wa
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
Is it bad if they all wanna make me puke???? 

"I've got a fever, and the only prescription.....is more cowbell."
Pinstriping by Josh
Pinstriping by Josh
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
Mine gets 25-40 city and 35-55 on the highway depending on throttle usage. Has 167 hp at the wheel dynoed. Does 0-60 in under 4 secs and only weighs 400lbs. Gotta love bikes. They are a lot more fun for the money. 

- scr8p
- Administrator
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Northampton, PA
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 1216 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
i have never...... nor WILL i ever...... give a rats ass about the fuel mileage in any car i own/have owned. in my old 79 camaro, when you jumped on it, it was like flushing a toilet. and i had a grin from ear to ear the whole time i was doing it.



- HotRodJosh
- Approved Member
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 1:55 pm
- Location: Spanaway, Wa
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
scr8p wrote:i have never...... nor WILL i ever...... give a rats ass about the fuel mileage in any car i own/have owned. in my old 79 camaro, when you jumped on it, it was like flushing a toilet. and i had a grin from ear to ear the whole time i was doing it.![]()
Mine makes 450hp, gets under 10 MPG, and can haul more than one chick.....[email protected] wrote:Mine gets 25-40 city and 35-55 on the highway depending on throttle usage. Has 167 hp at the wheel dynoed. Does 0-60 in under 4 secs and only weighs 400lbs. Gotta love bikes. They are a lot more fun for the money.
"I've got a fever, and the only prescription.....is more cowbell."
Pinstriping by Josh
Pinstriping by Josh
- reign79
- Approved Member
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 8:56 pm
- Location: cape cod mass
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
Well im a audi tech so ya know who got my votes. I have a 2008 audi a4 2.0 turbo to be honest i think i like the quatro all wheel drive more then the motor i put my snow tires and rims on and turn the traction controle off
Its like a rally car goes anywhere you point it.

Ryan
- mrlexan
- Approved Member
- Posts: 6250
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 6:49 pm
- Location: Upstate SC
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
You guys do realize that overall efficiency (technology) of the complete system (engine) can result in increased output (power at the crank)? Don't you?scr8p wrote:i have never...... nor WILL i ever...... give a rats ass about the fuel mileage in any car i own/have owned. in my old 79 camaro, when you jumped on it, it was like flushing a toilet. and i had a grin from ear to ear the whole time i was doing it.![]()
I am not here cause I am playing photographer and on my mountain bike.
www.gojammedia.com
www.gojammedia.com
- scr8p
- Administrator
- Posts: 16751
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Northampton, PA
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 1216 times
Re: 2009 auto engine of the year
yes, overall, the engine in my camaro was efficent at burning lots of fuel. 

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 1 Replies
- 1665 Views
-
Last post by GoMachV
-
- 5 Replies
- 714 Views
-
Last post by mrlexan
-
- 21 Replies
- 2106 Views
-
Last post by fordtransman
-
- 0 Replies
- 640 Views
-
Last post by T_Duffey
-
- 2 Replies
- 509 Views
-
Last post by Daryl Lane
-
- 10 Replies
- 3965 Views
-
Last post by MONSTER
-
- 0 Replies
- 732 Views
-
Last post by breizhator2
-
- 10 Replies
- 1199 Views
-
Last post by Hcp22
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 8 guests