dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

General info, Q&A.

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

Post Reply
User avatar
DMAT
Approved Member
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:53 am
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Been thanked: 3 times

dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by DMAT »

can someone give me the pros v cons on this? I see a lot of people gravitate towards a CVD but i dont know why.

User avatar
skunk.werkz
Approved Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:09 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by skunk.werkz »

Dogbones are stock, cheap. OEM universals are not rebuildable but offer better transmission of power through the driveline because its one telescoping unit. MIP CVD's are rebuildable and thus probably the most practical and affordable for long term racing purposes.

justinspeed79
Approved Member
Posts: 1679
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: Houston Texas
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by justinspeed79 »

Imho, there is not much difference in performance between them. I prefer plastic telescoping units because, for me, they have always been the most durable and trouble free. However, I have CVD's on most of my stuff just because of availability. I personally think that the "rebuildable" CVD is a bit of a sham. In my experience the bones and axles wear out just as fast, if not faster, than the couplings.

User avatar
DMAT
Approved Member
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:53 am
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by DMAT »

I guess for the moment, it sounds like its just worth running my univ joints until they go out.

were the plastic telescoping ones even made for an rc10 or was that modded?

justinspeed79
Approved Member
Posts: 1679
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:54 pm
Location: Houston Texas
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by justinspeed79 »

They used to be available from a few companies, but not anymore, unfortunately. They do still show up for sale occasionally on here or Ebay.

User avatar
RC10th
Approved Member
Posts: 4304
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:51 am
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 1034 times

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by RC10th »

The good thing about CVD's is your dogbone doesn't go flying into never never land if a ball cups pops off. CVD's are also rebuildable.

Dog bones tend to give the car a bit more side bite, although, if your just bashing you wouldn't be able to tell.
I was old school - when old school wasn't cool !

ron
Approved Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 9:31 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by ron »

I agree on plastics being better, but they have to be very beefed up to equal the strength of the metal ones. One thing with plastic I like is that they don't wear as much compared to metal, that is when plastic to plastic rubbing is occurring. The cups rather than the ball end of a dog bone wears much faster, and also the pins. Although the designs work, that is of CVDs, unis and dogbones, they all are not much durable and not designed for long term usage. One way of improving is using rubber boots, and fill the joints with a good amount of grease, preferably molybdenum grease.

I love the look of the universal shaft though although the CVDs are a little better and more serviceable.

I had bought a used buggy from a guy once cause it had some nice hopups and the cups and dogbones were worn quite a bit, so I did a quick fix by inserting a brass sleeve in the 4 cups, and gluing, than cut/file in the slots so that the dogbones go through into the cups. now the bones fit in snugly and don't rattle. The sleeve I got was from a radio telescoping anterna, one of the tubes was the perfect size to fit and let in the dogbone, so I cut it and used.

User avatar
DMAT
Approved Member
Posts: 884
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:53 am
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by DMAT »

any idea which cvd kits uses a 3/16 axle over a 1/4.

kaiser
Approved Member
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 10:03 am
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: dogbone vs Univ joint vs CVD

Post by kaiser »

DMAT wrote:any idea which cvd kits uses a 3/16 axle over a 1/4.
b4, t4, b44 front and rear, all of them from .0's to .2's.

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • Ds dogbone and cvd alternative.
    by acrazyjohnny » » in Associated On-Road Forum
    2 Replies
    1421 Views
    Last post by acrazyjohnny
  • Dogbone and CVD measurements
    by Frankentruck » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    5 Replies
    1857 Views
    Last post by jeepy2013
  • DS dogbone ASC8867 replacement HPI86002 sprint dogbone
    by JosephS » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    1 Replies
    551 Views
    Last post by LoboNYC
  • long ae ball joint
    by RichieRich » » in Temple's RC10 Tech Forum
    5 Replies
    936 Views
    Last post by ChisaiKuso
  • worlds cv joint question
    by twisted » » in RC10 Buggy Re-Release Forum
    12 Replies
    3613 Views
    Last post by clm
  • ZX-5 Universal-Joint Axle question
    by esaresky75 » » in Kyosho Forum
    2 Replies
    445 Views
    Last post by isobarik
  • Ball joint’s and turn buckles
    by Maxell27 » » in Associated On-Road Forum
    2 Replies
    497 Views
    Last post by juicedcoupe
  • 5.5mm ball joint with 4-40 threads
    by JosephS » » in R/C Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    1 Replies
    226 Views
    Last post by juicedcoupe

Return to “Temple's RC10 Tech Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests