RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
As it says really.
I understand the L is a 235mm car, and the LSS is 200mm? So what does am extra 35mm make?
I understand the L is a 235mm car, and the LSS is 200mm? So what does am extra 35mm make?
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:53 pm
- Location: EU
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Re: RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
The narrow car has less drag and therefore slightly higher top speed. But the wider car is more stable and have more downforce (with the same type of body) so could corner faster, overall faster laptime.
- Phin
- Approved Member
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:17 pm
- Location: NY²
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 236 times
Re: RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
The 35mm doesn't make anything by itself, and you'd need to define more variables like whether you're racing oval or road coarse; Stock or Mod motors; how many battery cells; etc. etc. before you can answer which car would win and lose.
Way I see it, with pan cars being so light, downforce is pretty important to putting the power down onto the track, and if a narrow body has enough downforce to keep the car's power planted then it will go faster in a straight line because it produces less drag. However the faster you want to go (i.e. faster motors + larger batteries) the more downforce you'll need to stop the pan car from lifting off the track, and that'd make a wider body more beneficial.
Though then you'd also have to consider things like larger batteries will add more weight to the car, and faster speeds will need longer distances (tracks) to reach, and a better driver to control.
Way I see it, with pan cars being so light, downforce is pretty important to putting the power down onto the track, and if a narrow body has enough downforce to keep the car's power planted then it will go faster in a straight line because it produces less drag. However the faster you want to go (i.e. faster motors + larger batteries) the more downforce you'll need to stop the pan car from lifting off the track, and that'd make a wider body more beneficial.
Though then you'd also have to consider things like larger batteries will add more weight to the car, and faster speeds will need longer distances (tracks) to reach, and a better driver to control.

- markbt73
- Approved Member
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 4:04 pm
- Location: Portland, OR USA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
The narrow cars came about for "superspeedway" racing, on big banked tracks like Lake Whipporwill in Florida, or bicycle velodromes. Very high speeds, very long races, the RC equivalent of Daytona or Talladega. Aerodynamic drag does come into play at those speeds, especially when endurance racing on those old 1200 and 1700 cells; if you could go longer before having to pit to change batteries than the other guy, maybe make one fewer stop, that was a huge advantage. Since there was a rule about maximum width, but not minimum, they decreased the drag by narrowing up the cars.
On a smaller track or a roadcourse, there probably isn't much difference.
On a smaller track or a roadcourse, there probably isn't much difference.
Re: RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
Nice piece of history, thanks...
I guess 1/6 more body width obviously gives 1/6 more downforce.
I'll have to weigh both together also...
Thanks
I guess 1/6 more body width obviously gives 1/6 more downforce.
I'll have to weigh both together also...
Thanks
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:53 pm
- Location: EU
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Re: RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
For oval racing the narrow car might be really better because of lower drag, but for onroad racing it is an disadvantage. At the 1996 Onroad worlds wide and narrow cars had been used by Associated and the HPI team and in the end the wide car was faster for both teams.
- THEYTOOKMYTHUMB
- Super Member
- Posts: 7103
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Evansville, IN
- Has thanked: 3577 times
- Been thanked: 1950 times
Re: RC10L vs RC10LSS - which would win?
The one I'm not driving. 

"The world looks so much better through beer goggles: Enjoy today, you never know what tomorrow may bring."
Ken
Ken
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 18 Replies
- 2521 Views
-
Last post by WillyThickfoot
-
- 0 Replies
- 565 Views
-
Last post by Dangeruss
-
- 7 Replies
- 2613 Views
-
Last post by klavy69
-
- 20 Replies
- 1908 Views
-
Last post by Jay Dub
-
- 9 Replies
- 1385 Views
-
Last post by purpletimbo
-
- 27 Replies
- 3493 Views
-
Last post by tulsa
-
- 4 Replies
- 1172 Views
-
Last post by arf
-
- 16 Replies
- 3200 Views
-
Last post by 10ls
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests