Chassis weight comparison

General info, Q&A.

Moderators: scr8p, klavy69

badhoopty
Approved Member
Posts: 3756
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by badhoopty »

bngiles wrote:Nice post.

Just goes to show what little the BS "milling" really did for the weight. Obviously just something to claim on the latest and greatest version.

I imagine the black one is lighter because lighter/thinner/cheaper aluminum was used. Corporations have a way of cutting costs in ways you wouldn't imagine.
ROH73 wrote: I've read somewhere (probably an old RCCA) that the reason for the milled pockets on the sides was to help direct dirt out of the chassis through the slightly larger holes. The 'H' pocket is probably just for show. The World's chassis main claim to fame is its hard anodizing, which makes it stiffer.
one thing i know is the worlds chassis' main claim to fame is it looked like brian kinwalds worlds car.

but since we're speculating, i'd imagine the channeling (and not the anodizing) is where the added rigidity comes from. if anything it just something done to the kinwald car to make it look trick. but regardless of why the worlds chassis was milled, the worlds kit was and is arguably the latest and greatest version of the rc10.

opinions and discussions are very welcome here, but if there is something that you are posting that you are A) claiming as fact. or B) think might get people 'pissed'. take a second and think about whether or not your opinion is valid and contributional, and not some recollection of something you read in rcca years ago or your own personal idea of the marketing schemes and production cutting costs of the corporate giant that was associated in the early 90's.

and besides, in a cage match the worlds chassis would absolutely destroy the graphite.

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16540
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 976 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by scr8p »

badhoopty wrote:and besides, in a cage match the worlds chassis would absolutely destroy the graphite.
pfft............... you must've read that in rcca.

:P :P

User avatar
RichieRich
Approved Member
Posts: 2352
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by RichieRich »

scr8p wrote:
badhoopty wrote:and besides, in a cage match the worlds chassis would absolutely destroy the graphite.
pfft............... you must've read that in rcca.

:P :P

Nah, that was in "How to Make Friends Online" by Asa. Oh SNAP! :lol: :lol:
Image

User avatar
scr8p
Administrator
Posts: 16540
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Northampton, PA
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 976 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by scr8p »

RichieRich wrote:Nah, that was in "How to Make Friends Online" by Asa.
who's that? :?

badhoopty
Approved Member
Posts: 3756
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:12 pm
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by badhoopty »

i dont mean to offend anybody, the thread just went south in a hurry. it's definitely cool to see the weight differences.

it happens to the best of us... remember when i thought the a&l steering was composite craft? :wink:

User avatar
call-911
Approved Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Mokena, IL USA
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by call-911 »

Cool post! Thanks for taking the time to snap the shots. I think my Siebenelch slammer nose plate will be going on a diet.
Keith C

User avatar
Eau Rouge
Approved Member
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:59 pm
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by Eau Rouge »

The World's chassis main claim to fame is its hard anodizing, which makes it stiffer.
Hard anodizing increases abrasion resistance and makes the surface harder, it doesn't make the aluminum stiffer. The hard anodizing would be less likely to get scratched up and gnarly than the gold anodizing. That's about it.

User avatar
59burst
Approved Member
Posts: 1011
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:52 am
Location: Bothell, WA

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by 59burst »

call-911 wrote:Cool post! Thanks for taking the time to snap the shots. I think my Siebenelch slammer nose plate will be going on a diet.
thanks, my wife likes this thread too. 'cuase she got a new cooking scale.

User avatar
ROH73
Approved Member
Posts: 623
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 am
Location: State College, PA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by ROH73 »

"Opinions and discussions are very welcome here, but if there is something that you are posting that you are A) claiming as fact. or B) think might get people 'pissed'. take a second and think about whether or not your opinion is valid and contributional, and not some recollection of something you read in rcca years ago or your own personal idea of the marketing schemes and production cutting costs of the corporate giant that was associated in the early 90's."

I can't fathom why a recollection from RCCA is not valid or contributing the this online forum/knowledge base, especially when that recollection is accurate. From the December 1990 issue, an article entitled "Inside Cliff Lett's Winning Cars," shows Lett's RC10 with milled pockets and specifically states "You might think that the slots and holes machined in the bottom are there to reduce weight, but, in fact, they allow dirt to fall out. This is a great idea, because dirt increases weight and affects handling."

Please see attached scan, showing pockets nearly identical to the ones in the Worlds chassis'.

Robert
Attachments
RCCA1990Dec.jpg
RCCA1990Dec.jpg (185.81 KiB) Viewed 884 times
RCCA1990Dec.jpg
RCCA1990Dec.jpg (185.81 KiB) Viewed 884 times

User avatar
Eau Rouge
Approved Member
Posts: 2225
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:59 pm
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by Eau Rouge »

From reading that magazine on and off for 20-odd years, it wouldn't be the first time they had no idea what they were talking about. :wink:

User avatar
ROH73
Approved Member
Posts: 623
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 am
Location: State College, PA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by ROH73 »

Eau Rouge wrote:
The World's chassis main claim to fame is its hard anodizing, which makes it stiffer.
Hard anodizing increases abrasion resistance and makes the surface harder, it doesn't make the aluminum stiffer. The hard anodizing would be less likely to get scratched up and gnarly than the gold anodizing. That's about it.
At my job, we spec hard anodizing quite a bit and the parts appear to be stiffer as compared to the regular anodizing. Unfortunately, I have no quantitative data to back this up, just personal experience, so perhaps I shouldn't have said it in my original post. But, on 6061 aluminum alloy, hard anodizing to black gives a .003" thick outer layer with a hardness similar to case hardened steel. Theoretically, one would expect this to affect the elasticity of the material, especially on something only 1/16" thick like the RC10 chassis.

Robert

User avatar
ROH73
Approved Member
Posts: 623
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 am
Location: State College, PA
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by ROH73 »

Eau Rouge wrote:From reading that magazine on and off for 20-odd years, it wouldn't be the first time they had no idea what they were talking about. :wink:
Perhaps...

But, I'm happy my memory is still working well :D .

User avatar
Halgar
Approved Member
Posts: 3319
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:34 pm
Location: USA
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 191 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by Halgar »

Eau Rouge wrote:From reading that magazine on and off for 20-odd years, it wouldn't be the first time they had no idea what they were talking about. :wink:
It took you reading RCCA for 20 years to figure out they have their heads up their patootie? :lol: :P :wink: I knew it within 6 months they didn't know anything, and that was holding onto the hope that they would write something worth reading, let alone buying the rag for. There were an awful lot of nice Traxxas ads though. :roll:
klavy69 wrote:... when I give you s&#t its a loan...I want it back!

User avatar
RichieRich
Approved Member
Posts: 2352
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by RichieRich »

I only look at RCCA for the pictures. Wait...maybe that's another magazine. No, I read that one for the articles. :lol:
Image

User avatar
call-911
Approved Member
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Mokena, IL USA
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Chassis weight comparison

Post by call-911 »

I remember Cliff Lett's car having the vertical sides of the tub having elongated milled slots all the way through. Maybe that is what they were referring to? They couldn't have been that idiotic to think that the shallow slots milled in the belly pan allowed dirt to fall out. :?
Keith C

Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in

  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
  • The Ferrari comparison...
    by fordtransman » » in Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    26 Replies
    1972 Views
    Last post by tizeye
  • Full-Option 235mm comparison...
    by rooster » » in Associated On-Road Forum
    15 Replies
    3031 Views
    Last post by rooster
  • Alloy gear case comparison
    by cooltoys » » in RC10 Buggy Forum
    16 Replies
    1490 Views
    Last post by klavy69
  • Holiday Buggy: Tamiya vs Extratoy Comparison
    by morrisey0 » » in Tamiya Forum
    3 Replies
    701 Views
    Last post by Dadio
  • Shootout Comparison: RC10 vs RC10WC vs RC10B4 vs RC10B7D?
    by TokyoProf » » in R/C Off-Topic / Chit-Chat
    0 Replies
    89 Views
    Last post by TokyoProf
  • 91 Masami Stealth replica (Photo Comparison Uploaded)
    by Seabass » » in RC10 Buggy Forum
    551 Replies
    66384 Views
    Last post by LusBus
  • Tamiya Tamtech 935 GT01 Body Comparison
    by mrlexan » » in Tamiya Forum
    6 Replies
    1125 Views
    Last post by mrlexan
  • CAT 2000 '98 Battery Comparison via ESC Data Logging
    by Typpo » » in Schumacher Forum
    0 Replies
    921 Views
    Last post by Typpo

Return to “Temple's RC10 Tech Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests