New Design chassis ASSEMBLED PROTOTYPE 18/04/10
- rc10johnny
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:48 pm
- Location: Richmond Va.
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: New Design chassis in plan UPDATE 21/02/10
on the antenna hole- the trans brace has a place for mounting the bracket . been puttin them for years. 2 cents
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:32 pm
- Location: Bas St-Laurent, Canada
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
OK Guys my friend just sent me picts of our prototype!!! I'm wetting my pants...
A few things...
This WILL be anodized. Most likely black but other collors are possible.
Looks like we made a mistake and forgot to remove the row of small holes on the sides but this is a prototype anyway.
My buddy lives in a city 300km from here so I haven't seen more than the picts but he says that this one is WAY stiffer than the Sassy Chassis.
Note that we added the holes in the back based on jwscab drawing for the grafinte rear bumber. I DO NOT have that part though so I just hope it fits.
Let me know what you think... suggestions are still welcome.
More pictures of the complete car later...
PS: we're also thinking of making a motor plate and shock towers but later...
A few things...
This WILL be anodized. Most likely black but other collors are possible.
Looks like we made a mistake and forgot to remove the row of small holes on the sides but this is a prototype anyway.
My buddy lives in a city 300km from here so I haven't seen more than the picts but he says that this one is WAY stiffer than the Sassy Chassis.
Note that we added the holes in the back based on jwscab drawing for the grafinte rear bumber. I DO NOT have that part though so I just hope it fits.
Let me know what you think... suggestions are still welcome.
More pictures of the complete car later...
PS: we're also thinking of making a motor plate and shock towers but later...

-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:38 pm
- Location: Vraa Denmark
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
Sweet
What type of material are you using ?
6061
7075
or titanium ?
How about a buggy chassis with the narrow truck nose ?
What type of material are you using ?
6061
7075
or titanium ?
How about a buggy chassis with the narrow truck nose ?
Morten Max
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:32 pm
- Location: Bas St-Laurent, Canada
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
It's going to be aircraft grade aluminum but I don't know the # I'll ask him...SnoopMaxx wrote:Sweet
What type of material are you using ?
6061
7075
or titanium ?
How about a buggy chassis with the narrow truck nose ?
Yes the RC10T is the next one on the list if this one works (I mean if we can make our fees back and some more to finance a new project). The machines are $$$$ to run and this is just a pet project.
- m_vice
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:46 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
looks nice, the car should look killer.
if you are doing the motor plate you should consider including the motor guard/rear bumper to it.


if you are doing the motor plate you should consider including the motor guard/rear bumper to it.

-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:32 pm
- Location: Bas St-Laurent, Canada
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
Yeah sure we'll have to come up with a nice desing but the simplest and cheapest motor plate would be flat witout bent parts so not connecting with the rear...m_vice wrote:looks nice, the car should look killer.![]()
if you are doing the motor plate you should consider including the motor guard/rear bumper to it.
- Lowgear
- Administrator
- Posts: 4325
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:00 pm
- Location: New England
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 769 times
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
That looks awesome!
What a difference from drawings to reality. I actually really like the holes on either side as it gives it some nice aesthetics. Now you just have to give your product a name. How about Classy Chassis?





-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:38 pm
- Location: Vraa Denmark
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
I was referring to the RC10 length chassis with RC10T narrow frontAYKBOBCAT wrote:It's going to be aircraft grade aluminum but I don't know the # I'll ask him...SnoopMaxx wrote:Sweet
What type of material are you using ?
6061
7075
or titanium ?
How about a buggy chassis with the narrow truck nose ?
Yes the RC10T is the next one on the list if this one works (I mean if we can make our fees back and some more to finance a new project). The machines are $$$$ to run and this is just a pet project.

Morten Max
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:32 pm
- Location: Bas St-Laurent, Canada
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
Isn't it what it is? a RC10T chassis... RC10 lenght but with a narrow front... Not sur I understand what you mean...SnoopMaxx wrote:I was referring to the RC10 length chassis with RC10T narrow frontAYKBOBCAT wrote:It's going to be aircraft grade aluminum but I don't know the # I'll ask him...SnoopMaxx wrote:Sweet
What type of material are you using ?
6061
7075
or titanium ?
How about a buggy chassis with the narrow truck nose ?
Yes the RC10T is the next one on the list if this one works (I mean if we can make our fees back and some more to finance a new project). The machines are $$$$ to run and this is just a pet project.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 699
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:38 pm
- Location: Vraa Denmark
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
We might be thinking about the same thing 
long version normal 10T chassis
Was this what you had in mind ?
or the short 10T chassis with buggy arms

long version normal 10T chassis
Was this what you had in mind ?
or the short 10T chassis with buggy arms
Morten Max
- jwscab
- Approved Member
- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 9:42 am
- Location: Chalfont, PA
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
right. since the truck used the rear holes on the noseplate, the chassis is longer. if you makea truck chassis, it will need to be longer
I think what he(and probably alot of others) would like to see is the short version, so you basically have the front pattern of the truck nose on your chassis there, rather than extend it out to match the truck wheelbase.
I think what he(and probably alot of others) would like to see is the short version, so you basically have the front pattern of the truck nose on your chassis there, rather than extend it out to match the truck wheelbase.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 2:32 pm
- Location: Bas St-Laurent, Canada
Re: New Design chassis PROTOTYPE 12/03/10
Got it... I never realized that the 10T was longer than the narrow nose buggy. I did buy a few 10T but just for the parts...jwscab wrote:right. since the truck used the rear holes on the noseplate, the chassis is longer. if you makea truck chassis, it will need to be longer
I think what he(and probably alot of others) would like to see is the short version, so you basically have the front pattern of the truck nose on your chassis there, rather than extend it out to match the truck wheelbase.
So yes I'm thinking buggy length but 10T front... However, this configuration might have much less demand for it (other than on this forum). We could probably do a batch for the group here once if we have enough people to make one batch. But we'll see first how this one goes. As I said beforee this is not a business, we both do this for fun (and I need to keep my friend happy as he's not into RC at all).
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 25 Replies
- 2931 Views
-
Last post by badhoopty
-
- 11 Replies
- 3337 Views
-
Last post by RC10th
-
- 10 Replies
- 1798 Views
-
Last post by unclemikey1978
-
- 29 Replies
- 4969 Views
-
Last post by Welshy40
-
- 17 Replies
- 3401 Views
-
Last post by hugger19
-
- 2 Replies
- 1373 Views
-
Last post by mikedealer
-
- 17 Replies
- 3617 Views
-
Last post by hugger19
-
- 49 Replies
- 5143 Views
-
Last post by Brandon G
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests