Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:14 am
- Location: NE,PA
Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
I got a new Associated B4.2 RS RTR and my boy got a new associated T4.2 RS RTR.
My boy's truck will go in reveres most of the time but not all and my buggie will not go in reveres at all.
Are these radios junk, should I look into something else? Am I doing something wrong?
I'm not new to this hobby or RTR's.
THX,
Lynn
My boy's truck will go in reveres most of the time but not all and my buggie will not go in reveres at all.
Are these radios junk, should I look into something else? Am I doing something wrong?
I'm not new to this hobby or RTR's.
THX,
Lynn
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:59 am
- Location: Manila/Singapore
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
You may need to calibrate the esc first,i think that is explained in the manual.
Sent from my Nokia Star Tac using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nokia Star Tac using Tapatalk
“It is more shameful to distrust our friends than to be deceived by them.”
― Confucius
― Confucius
- RC10th
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:51 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 1495 times
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
Many times if the trim is out or EPA knobs are turned down too far the ESC's wont go into forward/reverse.
Re-calibrating the ESC to the transmitter never hurts (unless you lose the manual)
Re-calibrating the ESC to the transmitter never hurts (unless you lose the manual)
I was old school - when old school wasn't cool !
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:14 am
- Location: NE,PA
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
THX!!
I went through and re calibrated the ESC as mentioned.
Now my buggie's reverse works hit and miss like my boy's does, where before it didn't work at all.
Lynn
I went through and re calibrated the ESC as mentioned.
Now my buggie's reverse works hit and miss like my boy's does, where before it didn't work at all.
Lynn
- RC10th
- Approved Member
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:51 am
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 50 times
- Been thanked: 1495 times
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
I'm not familiar with the ESC but most likely it's a "double tap" brake/reverse.
While driving along at moderate speed hit the brakes but keep them on. Does it come to a stop without going into reverse? If so just hit them again and it should go into reverse.
While driving along at moderate speed hit the brakes but keep them on. Does it come to a stop without going into reverse? If so just hit them again and it should go into reverse.
I was old school - when old school wasn't cool !
- mk-Zero
- Business Member
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:14 pm
- Location: Orange, CA
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 21 times
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
I've got the same b4.2 rs rtr, and I love it. You have to hold the throttle at full brake for a second or so, then release it, then push it in the brake/reverse direction again for it to go in reverse. Sometime it seems it takes more than a second of holding at full brake before releasing and reapplying for reverse to work.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 10:14 am
- Location: NE,PA
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
My B4.1 RTR's reverse isn't that sensitive, I wonder why?
Lynn
Lynn
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:07 am
- Location: Elbert County, CO
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Are the new associated RTR transmitters junk?
You may need to play with trims, or adjust neutral range.
There's nothing wrong with the XP2 or XP3 2.4 GHz systems, they're actually pretty decent for RTR stuff. Certainly not as good as a Futaba or Airtronics, but not bad.
Having said that, I've been quite impressed with the Flysky GT3C. Good range, lots of adjustment, 10 model memory, very lightweight, only $60 and extra receivers are a whopping $7/ea. I had issues with the GT3B model, but I own two of the Charlies, and they've been flawless.

There's nothing wrong with the XP2 or XP3 2.4 GHz systems, they're actually pretty decent for RTR stuff. Certainly not as good as a Futaba or Airtronics, but not bad.
Having said that, I've been quite impressed with the Flysky GT3C. Good range, lots of adjustment, 10 model memory, very lightweight, only $60 and extra receivers are a whopping $7/ea. I had issues with the GT3B model, but I own two of the Charlies, and they've been flawless.

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead; It is difficult only for others. It is the same when you are stupid."
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 1204 Views
-
Last post by Farabomb
-
- 6 Replies
- 690 Views
-
Last post by juicedcoupe
-
- 136 Replies
- 23124 Views
-
Last post by Diamond Dave
-
- 39 Replies
- 3605 Views
-
Last post by vegasjetta
-
- 19 Replies
- 1764 Views
-
Last post by Toyotachris1982
-
- 6 Replies
- 1647 Views
-
Last post by XLR8
-
- 2 Replies
- 882 Views
-
Last post by TycoTamiya4eva
-
- 1 Replies
- 1502 Views
-
Last post by j-sou
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests