Worlds Chassis Questions
- ChisaiKuso
- Approved Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:50 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Worlds Chassis Questions
OK ... I have two RC10 Worlds Cars. One is a restored all black car, and one is an "in progress" white and black car. This brings me to a few questions:
1) What was the point of the milled sections in the chassis?
2) Was the Worlds chassis really made of a stronger and/or thicker aluminum?
3) Did anyone else see that Worlds chassis (just the chassis!) sell for $178.50 (plus shipping) on eBay the other day?
3a) Are you kidding me?!?!
3b) Are these things really worth that kind of money?
3c) Am I the only one who thinks that is totally insane?
1) What was the point of the milled sections in the chassis?
2) Was the Worlds chassis really made of a stronger and/or thicker aluminum?
3) Did anyone else see that Worlds chassis (just the chassis!) sell for $178.50 (plus shipping) on eBay the other day?
3a) Are you kidding me?!?!
3b) Are these things really worth that kind of money?
3c) Am I the only one who thinks that is totally insane?
Something clever goes here...
- Charlie don't surf
- Approved Member
- Posts: 9220
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 280 times
- Been thanked: 379 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
ChisaiKuso wrote:OK ... I have two RC10 Worlds Cars. One is a restored all black car, and one is an "in progress" white and black car. This brings me to a few questions:
1) What was the point of the milled sections in the chassis? Lighten chassis, and allow a place for dirt to escape easier
2) Was the Worlds chassis really made of a stronger and/or thicker aluminum? Nope, Just hard annodized
3) Did anyone else see that Worlds chassis (just the chassis!) sell for $178.50 (plus shipping) on eBay the other day? Nope
3a) Are you kidding me?!?! Nope, I really didn't. Swear
3b) Are these things really worth that kind of money? Nope
3c) Am I the only one who thinks that is totally insane? Nope
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
Well, technically, the milling should stiffen the chassis a tiny bit. But more than likely it was done for weight. Keep in mind that we're spoiled with Lipo's these days. Back when I was racing in that era - there was no pre-race laps to work out the jitters.. you were geared to run exactly the race length.. no more.. no less.. and weight played a big part in battery life.
As for price... just a matter of supply and demand...
As for price... just a matter of supply and demand...
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:04 am
- Location: San Jose, Ca.
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
How is milling (removing material) supposed to stiffen the chassis exactly?
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
Increases the surface area.Jay Dub wrote:How is milling (removing material) supposed to stiffen the chassis exactly?
- ChisaiKuso
- Approved Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:50 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
Huh? Since when does increasing surface area by removing material also increase stiffness? Please explain this.Vermin wrote:Increases the surface area.Jay Dub wrote:How is milling (removing material) supposed to stiffen the chassis exactly?

Something clever goes here...
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
Well, there are different types of stiffness .. doubt you can really argue that the milled chassis has more static stiffness (traditional lets see how much weight we can apply to this before it bends). But there could be a huge arguement that the milled chassis exhibits more dynamic stiffness depending on how it is loaded and what sort of vibrations/loading it is seeing. Maybe I'm overthinking it a bit, and I certainly don't know what sort of destructive modeling Associated did when designing this chassis way back in the day - but I doubt they were like "Hey, lets waste lost of money and tool up some mills to cut some lines in these Worlds chassis just because it looks cool"
I know it seems ass backwards, but depending on the part and when designed correctly (and I'm not saying this chassis is), less can be more. For what it's worth, the chances of me digging out my old engineering books and finding a reference are horribly small.
I know it seems ass backwards, but depending on the part and when designed correctly (and I'm not saying this chassis is), less can be more. For what it's worth, the chances of me digging out my old engineering books and finding a reference are horribly small.

-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 1:36 am
- Location: Can be found @ WCRC Raceway!
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
http://www.ebay.com/itm/TEAM-ASSOCIATED-RC10-VINTAGE-WORLDS-CAR-CHASSIS-USED-GOOD-CONDITION-NO-RESERVE-/290715695479?pt=Radio_Control_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43b0017977#ht_500wt_1183
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-TEAM-ASSOCIATED-RC10-WORLDS-CAR-CHASSIS-RC-AE-/251054584548?pt=Radio_Control_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3a7404f2e4#ht_773wt_935
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-TEAM-ASSOCIATED-RC10-WORLDS-CAR-CHASSIS-RC-AE-/251054584548?pt=Radio_Control_Parts_Accessories&hash=item3a7404f2e4#ht_773wt_935
- Lowgear
- Administrator
- Posts: 4326
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 1:00 pm
- Location: New England
- Has thanked: 121 times
- Been thanked: 770 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
I never thought of that before and would have to agree.Vermin wrote:Well, technically, the milling should stiffen the chassis a tiny bit.
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
The milling adds a vertical surface to the cross section which increases the material's resistance to bending. Plain and simple. Much the same as bead rolling sheet metal.
Lighter stiffer stronger !!
Lighter stiffer stronger !!
- ROH73
- Approved Member
- Posts: 623
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:07 am
- Location: State College, PA
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
Actually, the World's chassis is a different aluminum alloy. I believe its 7075-T6 vs. the 6061-T6 used on all the previous chassis. 7075 is pretty much the strongest aluminum alloy available. It's stiffness and elastic properties would have made the largest change vs. the standard chassis. In comparison, the milling likely contributed almost no change other than weight reduction. The hard anodizing would have increased the stiffness slightly as well.
- ChisaiKuso
- Approved Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:50 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
I have heard this before too, but I've never been able to find any real documentation about the change in the alloy used. Is there any chance you have a source you can provide or a link to some additional reading? Thank you for sharing this.ROH73 wrote:Actually, the World's chassis is a different aluminum alloy. I believe its 7075-T6 vs. the 6061-T6 used on all the previous chassis. 7075 is pretty much the strongest aluminum alloy available. It's stiffness and elastic properties would have made the largest change vs. the standard chassis. In comparison, the milling likely contributed almost no change other than weight reduction. The hard anodizing would have increased the stiffness slightly as well.
Something clever goes here...
- ChisaiKuso
- Approved Member
- Posts: 526
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:50 pm
- Location: United States
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Worlds Chassis Questions
As sort of a follow up question to my previous post, I have also heard/read that a lot of the factory drivers never liked racing the graphite chassis cars. I think this had something to do with the chassis not reacting as well (too stiff?) on the typical tracks of the day. If this is true (and please correct me if I am wrong), why would AE have developed a stiffer tub chassis for the worlds car? Was it marginally stiffer than a gold tub chassis but not close to the stiffness of a graphite chassis?
I'm very interested in development history of the RC10, so I love useless trivia like this. Please keep the replies coming!
I'm very interested in development history of the RC10, so I love useless trivia like this. Please keep the replies coming!

Something clever goes here...
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 11 Replies
- 1787 Views
-
Last post by NCOHOG
-
- 4 Replies
- 578 Views
-
Last post by Group B
-
- 6 Replies
- 1424 Views
-
Last post by jwscab
-
- 76 Replies
- 13534 Views
-
Last post by joey_zrl
-
- 14 Replies
- 1493 Views
-
Last post by jwscab
-
- 18 Replies
- 2704 Views
-
Last post by mrlexan
-
- 4 Replies
- 549 Views
-
Last post by highwayracer
-
- 3 Replies
- 801 Views
-
Last post by Charlie don't surf
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests