Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
- Charlie don't surf
- Approved Member
- Posts: 9220
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 280 times
- Been thanked: 379 times
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=13059
However, the C stamp non milled tub was still included in the late 6035 team cars
However, the C stamp non milled tub was still included in the late 6035 team cars
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
not much help but the gold pan late CE is a C stamp also IIRC
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1818
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1209 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
Allright, that begs the question, what was the difference between B & C stamp chassis?Charlie don't surf wrote: ↑Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:12 pm http://www.rc10talk.com/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=13059
However, the C stamp non milled tub was still included in the late 6035 team cars
I always thought the C stamp chassis was a milled B stamp.
- juicedcoupe
- Super Member
- Posts: 3445
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2020 4:05 pm
- Location: Pascagoula, MS
- Has thanked: 265 times
- Been thanked: 2033 times
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
Late 10T's used the unmilled C stamp as well. I've got a couple of them.
Always looking for new and interesting ways to waste money.
- GoMachV
- Approved Member
- Posts: 12214
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
- Location: Twin Falls, ID
- Has thanked: 1084 times
- Been thanked: 3762 times
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
The C stamp chassis was, as mentioned above, available milled or plain. The milled version was a different grade alloy and was hard anodized. These are frequently purple by now. For the rest of my rambling here I will only be referring to the plain C not the milled. The early B and the late B had more of a difference than a late B to a plain C stamp. The early B had an offset battery holder carried over from the original A where the late B was centered. The C stamp chassis most commonly have the 6 gear holes not countersunk. There are some that are but the vast majority are not. If you held a late B and a plain C side by side you would be hard pressed to see any difference besides the countersinking.
-
- Approved Member
- Posts: 1818
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 1209 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
Thanks for the information. Do all original C stamps lack the counter sinking on the 6 gear holes?GoMachV wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 6:28 pm The C stamp chassis was, as mentioned above, available milled or plain. The milled version was a different grade alloy and was hard anodized. These are frequently purple by now. For the rest of my rambling here I will only be referring to the plain C not the milled. The early B and the late B had more of a difference than a late B to a plain C stamp. The early B had an offset battery holder carried over from the original A where the late B was centered. The C stamp chassis most commonly have the 6 gear holes not countersunk. There are some that are but the vast majority are not. If you held a late B and a plain C side by side you would be hard pressed to see any difference besides the countersinking.
By a different alloy does that mean the A&B were 6061 and the C milled were 7075.
Were the nose plates also made differently?
That combination would lead to a extremely durable tub. That would have been even more expensive to produce than a regular tub.
Do you know if the Re-re chassis were also a different alloy and hard anodized?
- GoMachV
- Approved Member
- Posts: 12214
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:31 pm
- Location: Twin Falls, ID
- Has thanked: 1084 times
- Been thanked: 3762 times
Re: Team Car vs Worlds Car (black pan)
No, as I said most lack it but not all.Do all original C stamps lack the counter sinking on the 6 gear holes?
A, B, and plain C were 6061. Worlds milled C stamp were 2024.By a different alloy does that mean the A&B were 6061 and the C milled were 7075.
The cut was different (lightened) however they did not advertise a different alloy.
Were the nose plates also made differently?
I am not sure the alloy but the quality of the rere chassis was terrible. They bend much easier.Do you know if the Re-re chassis were also a different alloy and hard anodized?
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
Sign in
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 8 Replies
- 1653 Views
-
Last post by DJGonzo69
-
- 23 Replies
- 3016 Views
-
Last post by mikea96
-
- 8 Replies
- 1769 Views
-
Last post by rwordenjr
-
- 5 Replies
- 2326 Views
-
Last post by sandkil
-
- 19 Replies
- 2436 Views
-
Last post by Charlie don't surf
-
- 1 Replies
- 1106 Views
-
Last post by scr8p
-
- 39 Replies
- 4663 Views
-
Last post by Daddeo
-
- 12 Replies
- 1391 Views
-
Last post by blown5.0
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests